Forecast evaluation improving using the simplest methods of individual forecasts’ combination
Ekaterina Astafyeva & Marina Turuntseva
What the paper says
Combining forecasts is considered the easiest way to improve the forecast quality compared to individual models. In this paper, we test the capabilities of the simplest methods of combination, such as simple averages and estimates based on the standard error of previous forecasts, to improve the performance of short-run forecasts of five resource price indicators (oil and metals). The basis of the work is the Gaidar Institute forecasts database, which provides the database of primary forecasts and allows you to calculate their combinations in real time. Based on the obtained results we conclude that even the simplest methods of combination are a way to improve the accuracy of forecasts. In addition, in the case of resource prices, one can even single out a group of methods (namely, combining with weights inversely proportional to the squared errors of individual forecasts) that provide the maximum gain in quality for the most periods.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.