Message framing in communications on the consumption and production of sustainable seafood: The significance of negative emotions

Nienke Böhm et al.

Food Quality and Preference2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105899article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates how different message frames impacts willingness to pay for sustainable alternatives and support for policies designed to bring about sustainable fishing practices. An online experiment was conducted with a sample from the Norwegian public ( N = 707) who were randomly assigned to reading different messages about the consequences of (un)sustainable fishing practices. A specific focus was placed on differences in message valence (positive vs. negative) and message perspective (general vs. personal). The analyses revealed significant total effects for three out of four message framing combinations on willingness to pay. Further examination of indirect effects indicated that both positively and negatively framed messages influenced willingness to pay and policy support primarily through negative emotions such as anger, worry, or sadness. In addition, there was an indirect effect of a negatively framed message through positive emotions for policy support. These findings suggest that emotional responses, particularly when negative, play a role in shaping sustainable seafood choices and public support for related policies, with message effectiveness depending less on framing features per se than on the emotions elicited. • Messages varied in valence and perspective (personal vs. general) • Messages increased willingness to pay and policy support via negative emotions • Personal–positive message framing directly increased willingness to pay • Message framing effects are not moderated by concern about sustainability

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105899

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nienke2026,
  title        = {{Message framing in communications on the consumption and production of sustainable seafood: The significance of negative emotions}},
  author       = {Nienke Böhm et al.},
  journal      = {Food Quality and Preference},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105899},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Message framing in communications on the consumption and production of sustainable seafood: The significance of negative emotions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.