Agricultural Input Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence from the (Underappreciated) Supply Side

Andrew Dillon et al.

Annual Review of Resource Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102324-122108article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.53

Abstract

Economists have long studied the diffusion of improved agricultural technologies, often aiming to understand and relax the constraints that discourage their adoption among smallholder farmers. While this effort has documented and explored a long list of on-farm market constraints, the role of agrodealers in agricultural input markets has received far less attention—a critical blind spot. We review the empirical literature on input markets in low-income countries with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. We argue that the relative sparsity of this literature reflects limitations in our workhorse models of the household and the firm combined with a supply-side data gap due to infrequent systematic surveys of agrodealer firms. Consequently, we understand too little about the diverse input supply chains that culminate with agrodealers—large and small—marketing key inputs to farmers. We synthesize current findings and articulate a research agenda centered on agricultural input markets, including implications for research methods.

8 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102324-122108

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2025,
  title        = {{Agricultural Input Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence from the (Underappreciated) Supply Side}},
  author       = {Andrew Dillon et al.},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Resource Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102324-122108},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Agricultural Input Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence from the (Underappreciated) Supply Side

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.53

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.70 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.