Staying With the Waste: Litter, Learning and Slow Violence in Wasted‐Edgelands

Ria Dunkley & Kirsten Somerville

Antipode2026https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70153article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Post‐industrial landscapes, often dismissed as wastelands, are increasingly recognised as important sites for rethinking environmental education. This paper conceptualises wasted‐edgelands, landscapes shaped by industrial legacies and capitalist disposability, as pedagogical sites that work on children's attention, ethics and relations, rather than as spaces requiring repair or restoration. Drawing on a 10‐week John Muir Award project with primary school children in a working‐class Scottish community, it examines how children encounter waste as a pedagogical force. Grounded in scholarship on slow violence, ecological entanglement and more‐than‐human relations, the paper reframes litter picking not as stewardship or environmental action, but as sustained attentiveness to waste's persistence. Children's engagements foreground ethical witnessing, speculation and relational thinking, emphasising endurance rather than erasure. The Wasted‐Edgelands Learning Labyrinth conceptualises learning as recursive and non‐linear, privileging return, uncertainty and lingering over behaviour change. The paper contributes to radical geographical debates on environmental justice, disposability and pedagogy in damaged landscapes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70153

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ria2026,
  title        = {{Staying With the Waste: Litter, Learning and Slow Violence in Wasted‐Edgelands}},
  author       = {Ria Dunkley & Kirsten Somerville},
  journal      = {Antipode},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70153},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Staying With the Waste: Litter, Learning and Slow Violence in Wasted‐Edgelands

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.