arbiter
JournalsAccount

Rural electrification, the credibility revolution, and the limits of evidence-based policy

Jörg Peters & Christoph Μ. Schmidt

Environment and Development Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x24000263article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.46

Abstract

The so-called credibility revolution dominates empirical economics, with its promise of causal identification to improve scientific knowledge and ultimately policy. By examining the case of rural electrification in the Global South, this opinion paper exposes the limits of this evidence-based policy paradigm. The electrification literature boasts many studies using the credibility revolution toolkit, but at the same time, several systematic reviews demonstrate that the evidence is divided between very positive and muted effects. This bifurcation presents a challenge to the science-policy interface, where policymakers, lacking the resources to sift through the evidence, may be drawn to the results that serve their (agency's) interests. The interpretation is furthermore complicated by unresolved methodological debates circling around external validity as well as selective reporting and publication decisions. These features, we argue, are not particular to the electrification literature but inherent to the credibility revolution toolkit.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x24000263

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jörg2025,
  title        = {{Rural electrification, the credibility revolution, and the limits of evidence-based policy}},
  author       = {Jörg Peters & Christoph Μ. Schmidt},
  journal      = {Environment and Development Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x24000263},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rural electrification, the credibility revolution, and the limits of evidence-based policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.