Behavioural constraints in energy technology uptake: evidence from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal

Gunther Bensch & Michael Grimm

Environment and Development Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100540article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Energy-efficient biomass cookstoves and small solar systems play an important role in the transition to clean energy. Despite their affordability and scalability, uptake remains low among households in sub-Saharan Africa. This paper examines whether household-level behavioural factors help explain this under-adoption. Drawing on data from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal, we analyse how willingness to pay for the technologies varies with risk aversion, innovation resistance, time preferences and beliefs. These traits explain part of the variation in purchase decisions, though effects are generally moderate. The findings improve our understanding of consumer behaviour with regard to innovative consumer goods at the base of the pyramid and inform policy and market strategies of suppliers entering these markets. We conclude by recommending that behavioural approaches be applied conservatively and only in conjunction with efforts to improve affordability and access.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100540

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gunther2026,
  title        = {{Behavioural constraints in energy technology uptake: evidence from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal}},
  author       = {Gunther Bensch & Michael Grimm},
  journal      = {Environment and Development Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100540},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Behavioural constraints in energy technology uptake: evidence from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.