arbiter
JournalsAccount

Australian media professionals’ views on reporting suicide and evidence-informed guidelines: a qualitative study

Jaelea Skehan et al.

Health Promotion International2026https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag019article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Collaborating with media to promote safe reporting of suicide is recognized as a promising population-level prevention strategy. While Australian media professionals are broadly aware of, and supportive of, existing guidelines for reporting suicide, variability in agreement with specific recommendations suggests a need to further explore underlying views and perceptions about reporting suicide and associated guidelines. This study analyzed responses from 83 media professionals responding to an open-ended question within a national cross-sectional survey. Using inductive thematic analysis, three key themes were collaboratively constructed: (i) reporting suicide can provide community benefits; (ii) tension exists between applying guidelines and concerns they may restrict media reporting; and (iii) there is an interaction between lived experience of suicide and media professionals' views about reporting. Findings highlight the complexity of balancing public health objectives with media practices and underscore the importance of nuanced engagement with media professionals to strengthen guideline implementation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag019

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jaelea2026,
  title        = {{Australian media professionals’ views on reporting suicide and evidence-informed guidelines: a qualitative study}},
  author       = {Jaelea Skehan et al.},
  journal      = {Health Promotion International},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Australian media professionals’ views on reporting suicide and evidence-informed guidelines: a qualitative study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.