← Back to results Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant
What the paper says The nonparametric approach to consumer-demand analysis—based on revealed-preference axioms—is reviewed. Particular attention is paid to questions of size and power of tests for consistency of data with the existence of a stable, well-behaved utility function that could have generated the data. An application to Australian meat demand is used to show how these notions can be quantified and how prior information about elasticities, following Sakong and Hayes, may be used to increase the power of the approach.
14 citations
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002646 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{julian1992,
title = {{Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP}},
author = {Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant},
journal = {Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
year = {1992},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002646},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP
AU - Alston, Julian M.
AU - Chalfant, James A.
JO - Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
PY - 1992
ER - Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant (1992). Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP. *Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002646 Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant. "Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP." *Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics* (1992). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002646. Consumer Demand Analysis According to GARP
Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant · Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · 1992
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002646 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.55 × 0.4 = 0.22 M · momentum 0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.