arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Instructed prevention actions reveal the associative nature of propositional response-effect contingency knowledge

Solveig Tonn et al.

Cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106435article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Because prevention actions result in the non-occurrence of certain events, it is rather unclear how action-event linkages can emerge for these action types. Here, we investigated whether verbal instructions alone can establish such linkages and how they influence behavior. Therefore, participants had to memorize propositional knowledge about prevention actions, and we tested how actions in a subsequent, unrelated task were impacted by this knowledge. Our results demonstrate that actions were facilitated by the very event they are known to prevent, not by the absence of this event. Thus, these action-event linkages were both (a) 'propositional', as they were established by verbal instructions alone, and also (b) 'associative', as they impacted behavior akin to unqualified, bidirectional associations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106435

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{solveig2026,
  title        = {{Instructed prevention actions reveal the associative nature of propositional response-effect contingency knowledge}},
  author       = {Solveig Tonn et al.},
  journal      = {Cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106435},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Instructed prevention actions reveal the associative nature of propositional response-effect contingency knowledge

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.