Earnings Claims and Disclaimers in Multilevel Marketing: Testing the Impact of Self-Regulatory Guidance
Stacie A. Bosley et al.
Abstract
This research assesses the adoption of self-regulatory guidance in the multilevel marketing (MLM) industry as it relates to earnings claims and disclaimers and studies the impact of disclaimers embedded in MLM promotional material. Based on a review of over 2,000 MLM marketing materials with atypical claims, Study 1 finds that the industry's own self-regulatory disclaimer guidance has not been adopted by MLM firms. Instead, MLM firms overwhelmingly use no disclaimers or vague, nonprominent disclaimers. Study 2 tests the impact of disclaimers that align with actual MLM industry practice against disclaimers aligned with self-regulatory guidance, both to assess the impact of current practice and to evaluate the “what if” scenario of guidance adoption. Results indicate that actual disclaimers have no impact, while guidance-aligned disclaimers do impact consumer judgments and interest. As there are multiple differences between actual disclaimers and those aligned with self-regulatory guidance, Study 3 tests the relative importance of disclaimer content and prominence. Results indicate that both content and prominence are tied to disclaimer impact. Findings inform the self-regulatory and regulatory framework for the MLM industry and disclaimer design and content.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.