arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Behavioural Intention and Smart Home Technology Adoption

Neil Anthony Daruwala

International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction2025https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.372059article
ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Despite being available for over two decades, the acceptance of Smart Home Technology (SHT) remains slower than anticipated, with technophobia acting as a significant barrier. This study integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to investigate how psychological and cultural factors influence SHT acceptance. A mediation analysis involving English (N = 284) and Spanish (N = 230) participants assessed whether technophobia, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness mediate the relationship between the frustration of psychological needs and behavioural intention. The findings suggest indirect effects through technophobia and usability factors, with Spanish participants reporting greater frustration yet a higher intention to adopt. These results underscore the need for culturally tailored interventions, such as localised education and improved usability, to enhance confidence and support broader SHT adoption.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.372059

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{neil2025,
  title        = {{Behavioural Intention and Smart Home Technology Adoption}},
  author       = {Neil Anthony Daruwala},
  journal      = {International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.372059},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Behavioural Intention and Smart Home Technology Adoption

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.