Recentralization in Mexico: Reconfiguring the Center in Intergovernmental Relations

Omar Báez & Kent Eaton

Comparative Politics2025https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17380786914071article
ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Understanding recentralization as a vertical phenomenon requires careful attention to the horizontal distribution of power at the national level. We articulate a theoretical argument that emphasizes the content of the coalition that enacts recentralization, demonstrating that politicians can return power to the center without empowering the president. In Mexico, the pluralism of the coalition that pushed for recentralization from 2007 to 2018 led to institutional designs that avoided investing authority in the presidency and opted instead to empower a series of autonomous constitutional bodies. The Mexican case thus points to a simple but powerful hypothesis to add to the literature on multilevel governance: the broader that coalitions that push for recentralization, the wider the set of actors who will be empowered at the center of the political system.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17380786914071

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{omar2025,
  title        = {{Recentralization in Mexico: Reconfiguring the Center in Intergovernmental Relations}},
  author       = {Omar Báez & Kent Eaton},
  journal      = {Comparative Politics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17380786914071},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Recentralization in Mexico: Reconfiguring the Center in Intergovernmental Relations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.