arbiter
JournalsAccount

How the realized measure of a worker’s performance affects their perception of their compensation

Jeremy Douthit et al.

Management Accounting Research2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100927article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Workers often struggle to fully appreciate the quality of their performance. Rather, workers use the measure of their performance that is realized from their firm’s measurement system, which is typically imperfect, as a guide to do so. This study examines how workers’ perceptions about their compensation depend on the realized measure of their performance. Our experimental results suggest that before performing a task, workers display a fairness sentiment whereby they expect compensation to decrease as the measure of performance suggests worse performance. However, once the measure of their performance is realized, workers’ fairness sentiments weaken, and they request higher-than-expected compensation, with this deviation increasing as the realized measure worsens. Thus, a realized measure of performance distorts workers’ perceptions about their compensation and their fairness sentiments. This suggests that the benefits of perceived “fair” worker compensation are less likely to occur once workers have realized measures of performance.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100927

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jeremy2025,
  title        = {{How the realized measure of a worker’s performance affects their perception of their compensation}},
  author       = {Jeremy Douthit et al.},
  journal      = {Management Accounting Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100927},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How the realized measure of a worker’s performance affects their perception of their compensation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.