Including parameter uncertainty in loss distributions using calibrating priors

Stephen Jewson & Trevor J. Sweeting

Annals of Actuarial Science2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100237article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We revisit the question of how to include parameter uncertainty in univariate parametric models of losses and loss ratios. We first review the statistical theory for including parameter uncertainty based on right Haar priors (RHPs), which applies to many commonly used models. In this theory, the prior is chosen in such a way as to ensure matching between predicted probabilities and the relative frequencies of future outcomes in repeated tests. This property is known as reliability, or calibration. We then test priors for including parameter uncertainty in a number of models not covered by RHP theory. For these models, we find priors that generate predictions that are more reliable than predictions based on maximum likelihood, although they are not perfectly reliable. We discuss numerical schemes that can be used to generate Bayesian predictions, including a novel use of asymptotic expansions, and we include an example in which we show the impact of including parameter uncertainty in the modeling of extreme hurricane losses. The tail loss estimates show material increases due to the inclusion of parameter uncertainty. Finally, we describe a new software library that makes it straightforward to apply the methods we describe.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100237

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stephen2026,
  title        = {{Including parameter uncertainty in loss distributions using calibrating priors}},
  author       = {Stephen Jewson & Trevor J. Sweeting},
  journal      = {Annals of Actuarial Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100237},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Including parameter uncertainty in loss distributions using calibrating priors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.