The UNHCR’s Graduation Approach for Camp-based Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Zimbabwe’s Tongogara Refugee Camp

Raymond Taruvinga et al.

The International Journal of Community and Social Development2025https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251370434article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The article critiques the graduation approach, a poverty alleviation strategy implemented by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and its partners in low-income refugee-receiving countries. This article reports on a qualitative study conducted in 2020 in Zimbabwe’s Tongogara refugee camp with 47 participants through face-to-face interviews. We apply the lens of Amartya Sen’s development as freedom to demonstrate how multiple unfreedoms in the refugee camps context curtail the sustainability of the graduation approach’s six sequential stages. We find that in Tongogara, restrictions on refugees’ freedom of movement and other institutional limitations undercut the approach’s chance of viability. We conclude that unless structural concessions are made towards enhancing refugees’ agency, camp-based income-generating activities will remain at the subsistence level. We recommend that the six graduation stages be treated as indivisible and cumulative and that a stage-based evaluation be employed to guarantee the requisite freedoms at each stage.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251370434

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{raymond2025,
  title        = {{The UNHCR’s Graduation Approach for Camp-based Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Zimbabwe’s Tongogara Refugee Camp}},
  author       = {Raymond Taruvinga et al.},
  journal      = {The International Journal of Community and Social Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251370434},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The UNHCR’s Graduation Approach for Camp-based Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Zimbabwe’s Tongogara Refugee Camp

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.