“I gave in and I’m not proud . . . ”: When responsible consumers transgress their personal norms

Fabien Rogeon et al.

Recherche et Applications en Marketing2025https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241311088article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Being a responsible consumer represents a daily challenge and there are many obstacles to implementing responsible behaviors. Past research has underlined the gap between pro-environmental attitudes and effective behaviors, highlighting obstacles to the adoption of responsible behaviors. However, it has hitherto not looked at the transgressions of consumers who adopt responsible behaviors in their daily lives. To address this gap, our research adopts a qualitative approach, based on semi-directive interviews conducted using the critical incident technique. Our analysis revealed several reasons why responsible consumers transgress their personal norms, and how these “consumer green transgressions” are managed by the responsible consumers. We also established a typology of “consumer green transgressions” based on a double categorization: anticipated versus impulsive transgressions and repetitive versus exceptional transgressions. Finally, we highlighted two “cause(s) → transgression → consequence(s)” trajectories. The results of this research offer several theoretical contributions and managerial implications, including discussing the literature on “green gap.”

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241311088

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fabien2025,
  title        = {{“I gave in and I’m not proud . . . ”: When responsible consumers transgress their personal norms}},
  author       = {Fabien Rogeon et al.},
  journal      = {Recherche et Applications en Marketing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241311088},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“I gave in and I’m not proud . . . ”: When responsible consumers transgress their personal norms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.