DMAIC approach to using confidence intervals to assess conformance and reduce variation in net weight for a manufactured product: a case study

Kesiena Ezewu et al.

International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage2024https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssca.2024.139597article
AJG 1
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

Markets have become global, and economic conditions are becoming more competitive. To ensure products meet international standards, manufacturers must begin to key into the average quantity system for products released into the market. This paper demonstrates the applicability of deploying confidence intervals within a DMAIC structure to assess conformance in the net weight of a manufactured product. We applied the I-MR chart to investigate stability in the manufacturing process and used the Ishikawa fishbone diagram to improve consistency in net weight, reducing the variability from a standard deviation of 1.5 to 0.39. The percentage out of specification improved from 76.6% to 0.02%. The process capability indices Cp and Cpk improved from 0.2 to 1.32 and -0.21 to 1.25, respectively. Finally, a 97.5% confidence interval affirmed the suitability of lots for the international market in view of AQS standards as demanded by the government and international regulatory agencies.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssca.2024.139597

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kesiena2024,
  title        = {{DMAIC approach to using confidence intervals to assess conformance and reduce variation in net weight for a manufactured product: a case study}},
  author       = {Kesiena Ezewu et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssca.2024.139597},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

DMAIC approach to using confidence intervals to assess conformance and reduce variation in net weight for a manufactured product: a case study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.24 × 0.4 = 0.09
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.