Diverging consequences of protectionism: tariffs and agricultural GDP across Italian provinces, 1871–1911

Francesco Maria Salvatore Fiore Melacrinis & Emanuele Felice

Cliometrica: journal of historical economics and econometric history2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-025-00321-xarticle
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract We reconstruct agricultural production across Italian provinces from 1871 to 1911 and examine how protectionist tariffs differently impacted on economic growth. Using a difference-in-differences model, we find that tariffs' effects varied significantly following local agricultural institutions: in most of the North, tariffs fostered modernization and productivity growth; conversely, in the South tariffs, although benefitting landowners in the short run, reinforced extractive practices and hindered development. These divergent responses to the same policy intervention deepened Italy’s North–South divide and highlight how institutional regimes and local conditions mediated the effectiveness of trade protection.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-025-00321-x

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{francesco2025,
  title        = {{Diverging consequences of protectionism: tariffs and agricultural GDP across Italian provinces, 1871–1911}},
  author       = {Francesco Maria Salvatore Fiore Melacrinis & Emanuele Felice},
  journal      = {Cliometrica: journal of historical economics and econometric history},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-025-00321-x},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Diverging consequences of protectionism: tariffs and agricultural GDP across Italian provinces, 1871–1911

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.