Political and Institutional Development in England

Mark Koyama

Manchester School2026https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70039article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT This paper revisits the political and institutional development of England from the Magna Carta to the Glorious Revolution. I argue that institutional change in this period is best understood through the lens of coalition formation. Political elites had heterogeneous preferences over first two, and then three, recurring axes of disagreement: constitutional prerogatives, foreign policy, and after the Reformation, religion. Institutional change occurred when shocks caused coalitions to form, fracture, and realign. I discuss three episodes. First, due to defeat in France, a baronial coalition was able to check the power of the king through the Magna Carta. Second, the Reformation introduced religion as a new axis of conflict, ultimately giving rise to organized political parties during the Exclusion Crisis of 1679–1681. Third, the Glorious Revolution succeeded when James II's pro‐Catholic policies shattered the Tory coalition that had sustained the late Stuart monarchy. Using data on 750 Exclusion Crisis MPs, I document the structure of these political alignments empirically, and discuss how the defection of Tory elites was decisive in 1688.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70039

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mark2026,
  title        = {{Political and Institutional Development in England}},
  author       = {Mark Koyama},
  journal      = {Manchester School},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70039},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Political and Institutional Development in England

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.