arbiter
JournalsAccount

Identifying Drivers of Deviations From Rational Expectations: Using a New Irrational Index for Inflation Forecasts

Belen Chocobar & Peter Claeys

Journal of Forecasting2026https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70136article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Most studies on inflation forecasts have studied behavioral biases, informational frictions, or external shocks in isolation, without considering how these factors jointly drive deviations from rational expectations. We therefore adopt an integrated framework that simultaneously estimates the behavioral, informational, and external determinants of deviations from rationality. To measure the deviations, we develop a novel irrationality index—following Rossi and Sekhposyan's (2016) Fluctuation Rationality Test—to measure experts' time‐varying deviations from rationality in US year‐ahead inflation forecasts between 2010 and 2022. We then estimate the impact of different behavioral, informational, and external drivers on deviations from rationality using panel models. Our results indicate that external information shocks, interest rate expectations, as well as geopolitical risk all significantly drive the deviations from rationality. These findings highlight the value of a unified approach to expectation formation, moving beyond the isolated analyses that are common to the literature.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70136

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{belen2026,
  title        = {{Identifying Drivers of Deviations From Rational Expectations: Using a New Irrational Index for Inflation Forecasts}},
  author       = {Belen Chocobar & Peter Claeys},
  journal      = {Journal of Forecasting},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70136},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Identifying Drivers of Deviations From Rational Expectations: Using a New Irrational Index for Inflation Forecasts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.