Front Line Managers and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Interactional Justice and Supportive Culture

Kenneth Cafferkey et al.

International Journal of Employment Studies2019article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.38

What the paper says

The contributions of front line managers (FLMs) are traditionally assumed to have a profound impact on the performance of individuals but few studies have examined the role of front line managers in the process through which positive work behaviour and attitudes are realised. This research introduces interactional justice and supportive culture as two potentially key conditions under which positive outcomes result. Using original data from Academics in Malaysia, a collective culture, we test the proposition supportive FLM will influence work outcomes and also interactional justice with a supportive culture. Academics totalling 324 from private universities in Malaysia participated in this study. Findings suggest that interactional justice mediates the relationship between support FLM and proactive behaviour and work attitude. Supportive culture moderated only work attitude. Overall, our findings illustrate that supportive FLMs play critical role in developing positive work behaviour and attitude, however supportive culture was not a necessary condition in eliciting work behaviour. The implications for these findings are discussed and important areas for future research are presented.

3 citations

Cite this paper

@article{kenneth2019,
  title        = {{Front Line Managers and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Interactional Justice and Supportive Culture}},
  author       = {Kenneth Cafferkey et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Employment Studies},
  year         = {2019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Front Line Managers and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Interactional Justice and Supportive Culture

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.10 × 0.4 = 0.04
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.