arbiter
JournalsAccount

Effectual Reasoning: How Women Entrepreneurs Start Sport for Development Organizations

Olga Khokhryakova & Per G. Svensson

Journal of Sport Management2026https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2025-0123article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

While the Sport for Development and Peace field has attracted significant scholarly attention, existing research has focused on established organizations rather than the formative stages of organizational development. This study is the first to explore the experiences of women launching their own Sport for Development and Peace organizations ( n = 21). Building on previous knowledge regarding the additional barriers that women often experience in both sport and entrepreneurship, we intentionally focused on female founders. We draw on effectuation theory to analyze how women entrepreneurs make decisions while creating nonprofit ventures. Founders engaged in effectual reasoning, acting with existing resources to shape the future, rather than planning, and predicting what may happen. Yet our findings challenge the assumption of maintaining control over uncertainty by employing effectuation. We demonstrate the need for a more contextualized model of effectual reasoning in resource-constrained and fragmented ecosystems, such as Sport for Development and Peace, accounting for the systemic constraints women entrepreneurs must navigate.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2025-0123

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{olga2026,
  title        = {{Effectual Reasoning: How Women Entrepreneurs Start Sport for Development Organizations}},
  author       = {Olga Khokhryakova & Per G. Svensson},
  journal      = {Journal of Sport Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2025-0123},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Effectual Reasoning: How Women Entrepreneurs Start Sport for Development Organizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.