Chapter 1 Experimental Research on Corruption: Introduction and Overview

Danila Serra & Léonard Wantchekon

Research in Experimental Economics2012https://doi.org/10.1108/s0193-2306(2012)0000015003book-chapter
ABDC B
Weight
0.73

What the paper says

In Chapter 2, Ananish Chaudhuri surveys the empirical evidence on the existence of gender differences in individuals’ propensity to engage in corruption. While the chapter begins with a review of the findings generated by cross-country studies, the main focus of the discussion is in the insights provided by laboratory experiments specifically designed to test for gender differentials in corrupt transactions. According to the carefully conducted survey of the literature, the existing experimental evidence suggests that females are either equally or less willing to engage in corruption than males; there is very little evidence that women behave more corruptly than men. The author discusses possible reasons for gender differentials in corrupt behavior, such as risk aversion and preferences for reciprocation. Finally, Chaudhuri emphasizes that gender effects are more likely to be observed in studies conducted in developed countries and calls for further research to be conducted in developing countries, with the aim of shedding light on the relationships between gender differences in corrupt behavior and the cultural background of the experimental participants.

19 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0193-2306(2012)0000015003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{danila2012,
  title        = {{Chapter 1 Experimental Research on Corruption: Introduction and Overview}},
  author       = {Danila Serra & Léonard Wantchekon},
  journal      = {Research in Experimental Economics},
  year         = {2012},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0193-2306(2012)0000015003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Chapter 1 Experimental Research on Corruption: Introduction and Overview

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.73

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.98 × 0.4 = 0.39
M · momentum0.75 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.