Bank lending and macroprudential policies: are Islamic banks differentially affected?

Abdulla Ahmed Albinali

Islamic Economic Studies2023https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-02-2022-0018article
ABDC C
Weight
0.55

What the paper says

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to study the relevance of macroprudential policies (MPPs) in influencing bank lending in small open economies with dual banking systems. Design/methodology/approach In the analysis, the author employed the dynamic panel data methodology as compared to alternate techniques since it is able to address potential endogeneity challenges. Findings Using quarterly data from the period 2002–2020, the author finds that MPPs are highly effective in containing the growth of public credit, whereas its impact on private credit is much less effective. The disaggregated findings reveal that macroprudential measures are less effective in containing the growth of private credit by Islamic banks. Originality/value The majority of studies on MPPs are focused on emerging and advanced economies, limiting their policy appeal from the standpoint of small open economies. In this connection, this paper contributes to the literature on the relevance of such policies for a small open economy with a dual banking system and significant hydrocarbon exports. The paper's analysis therefore holds relevance for similar economies, both in the region and elsewhere, on the role and relevance of MPPs with emphasis on Islamic banks.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-02-2022-0018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{abdulla2023,
  title        = {{Bank lending and macroprudential policies: are Islamic banks differentially affected?}},
  author       = {Abdulla Ahmed Albinali},
  journal      = {Islamic Economic Studies},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-02-2022-0018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bank lending and macroprudential policies: are Islamic banks differentially affected?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.55

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.51 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.