An Evaluation of the Gender Inclusivity of UK Senior Academic Job Advertisements

Helen Hooper

Gender, Work and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70092article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that small changes to the content of job advertisements can influence an applicant’s perceived fit with the role being advertised and has analyzed the effects of specific features on women. This paper presents an original gender inclusion analysis framework and reports on its use to critically assess 140 senior academic job adverts as an underexplored institutional mechanism that may help sustain gender inequality in academic leadership. This research concludes that such adverts are not gender inclusive, as most do not explicitly encourage nor support gender diversity, and many contain subtle signals that could increase women's perceived lack of fit with advertised roles; 41% of adverts utilized masculine wording, which could deter female candidates; just 15% ( n = 21) prioritized women via a positive action statement; specific employee benefits, which could signal support for applicants with (child)caring responsibilities, were not prioritized, with 11% ( n = 15) and 6% ( n = 9) of adverts promoting family‐friendly policies or an on‐site nursery, respectively, and only 6% of roles were listed with a part‐time working opportunity. 97% of institutes in this research held an Athena Swan Charter award in recognition of gender equality work, suggesting a lack of impact on recruitment and highlighting scope for development of gender‐fair recruitment practices.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70092

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{helen2026,
  title        = {{An Evaluation of the Gender Inclusivity of UK Senior Academic Job Advertisements}},
  author       = {Helen Hooper},
  journal      = {Gender, Work and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70092},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

An Evaluation of the Gender Inclusivity of UK Senior Academic Job Advertisements

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.