Equitable Decision‐Making in Community Foundations

Lauren Azevedo & A. L. Bell

Nonprofit Management and Leadership2025https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21643article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.46

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Community foundations can strengthen their localities by connecting philanthropists with areas of greatest need. This article seeks to examine if equitable practices constitute more equitable decision‐making in the structure and processes of the foundation. To this end, we explore decision‐making in terms of the processes involved in funding allocation and grantmaking of discretionary funds in foundation boardrooms, where these decisions typically begin or take place. Through an inductive approach, we formulate a theoretical framework and test our framework through surveys to community foundation leaders. Findings reveal that cultivating diversity and inclusive practices in decision‐making, organizing decisions by mission and strategic goals, and an organizational commitment to equity can strengthen perceived equitable decision‐making. This research has substantial implications in nonprofit spaces by exploring informal and nontraditional prescriptions for better engaging with communities they are serving and creating a more inclusive society. Theoretical and practical contributions are made for advancing equity through decision‐making in spaces where important community‐based decisions are made.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21643

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lauren2025,
  title        = {{Equitable Decision‐Making in Community Foundations}},
  author       = {Lauren Azevedo & A. L. Bell},
  journal      = {Nonprofit Management and Leadership},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21643},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Equitable Decision‐Making in Community Foundations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.