arbiter
JournalsAccount

Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work

Mikaela Sundberg

Journal of Professions and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag003article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Organizational and sociological studies of professions typically approach knowledge as something professionals acquire during education, training, and work experience and apply flexibly when providing their services. This paper expands the view by addressing how professionals produce knowledge, asking how they make judgement about how far to pursue their knowledge-making. Based on original, qualitative data on forensic pathology in Sweden, I introduce the concept of knowledge-producing responsibility to address how such judgements take place relative to knowledge about causes of death. I present two perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility. The research perspective values detail, being extensive, and as close to the truth about the case as possible. The bureaucratic perspective focuses on delivery time, restrictive resource-use, and provision of answers. The question of how far to pursue investigations is incremental to all forms of knowledge production and hence of a general nature. Knowledge-producing responsibility offers several directions for potential studies of related questions of professional knowledge work.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mikaela2026,
  title        = {{Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work}},
  author       = {Mikaela Sundberg},
  journal      = {Journal of Professions and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.