The Meta Pricing Efficiency of Producer Cooperatives Under Hedonic Product Attributes: The Case of German Wine

Rebecca Hansen & Sebastian Hess

Journal of Agricultural Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70036article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

High internal coordination costs may put cooperatives at a disadvantage in the production and marketing of agri‐food products with hedonic quality attributes. The efficiency of cooperatives and non‐cooperatives is therefore compared with respect to their ability to place wines on the market at prices that reflect their measurable quality attributes. The results of a stochastic metafrontier panel of 1240 wine prices from two German wine guides suggest that consumers should purchase wine from cooperatives if they are seeking a favourable relation between market prices and wine quality. In turn, members of wine cooperatives should ask themselves why non‐cooperatives are typically better at achieving higher prices for the respective quality of their wines and how they can close the price gap with non‐cooperative wineries.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70036

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rebecca2026,
  title        = {{The Meta Pricing Efficiency of Producer Cooperatives Under Hedonic Product Attributes: The Case of German Wine}},
  author       = {Rebecca Hansen & Sebastian Hess},
  journal      = {Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70036},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Meta Pricing Efficiency of Producer Cooperatives Under Hedonic Product Attributes: The Case of German Wine

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.