From Dystopian Academia to Utopian Sororal Counterspaces: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Women Academics in Business Schools

Roula Gergess et al.

Gender, Work and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70098article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The contemporary business school is increasingly portrayed as dystopian, shaped by neoliberal managerialism, metric‐driven performativity, and precarious labor. These pressures weigh heaviest on women academics, whose careers are fractured by intersecting lines of gender, race, class, and citizenship. Drawing on a year‐long collaborative autoethnography involving three women scholars situated in three distinct national systems, this article interrogates the everyday dystopias of academic life and maps the emergence of sororal counterspaces: utopian pockets of solidarity, care, and collective resistance that materializes within, against, and beyond the neoliberal academy. By weaving feminist political economy, intersectionality, and utopian studies with dialogic vignettes, we demonstrate how practicing sorority transcends entrenched institutional boundaries, rehumanizes academic subjectivities, and offers concrete mechanisms for change. We conclude with a framework for cultivating sororal counterspaces and ritualizing solidarity and a call for gender‐equitable, care‐centered business schools.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70098

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{roula2026,
  title        = {{From Dystopian Academia to Utopian Sororal Counterspaces: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Women Academics in Business Schools}},
  author       = {Roula Gergess et al.},
  journal      = {Gender, Work and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70098},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

From Dystopian Academia to Utopian Sororal Counterspaces: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Women Academics in Business Schools

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.