Stock Market Manipulation and Its Regulation

Merritt B. Fox et al.

Yale Journal on Regulation2018article
ABDC B
Weight
0.70

What the paper says

More than eighty years after federal law first addressed stock market manipulation, federal courts remain fractured by disagreement and confusion about manipulation law's most foundational questions. Only last year, plaintiffs petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve a sharp split among the federal circuits concerning manipulation law's central question: whether trading activity alone can ever be considered illegal manipulation under federal law. Academics have been similarly confused economists and legal scholars cannot agree on whether manipulation is possible in principle; let alone on how, if it is, to address it properly in practice.\nThis Article offers an analytical framework for understanding manipulation, which resolves these questions, clarifies federal law, and can guide regulators in successfully prosecuting financial law's most intractable wrong. We draw on the tools of microstructure economics and the theory of the firm to provide a synthesis of the various distinct forms of manipulation, identify who is harmed by each form, and evaluate their social welfare effects. This Article thus lays the foundation for a renewed understanding of manipulation and its place within securities regulation.

21 citations

Cite this paper

@article{merritt2018,
  title        = {{Stock Market Manipulation and Its Regulation}},
  author       = {Merritt B. Fox et al.},
  journal      = {Yale Journal on Regulation},
  year         = {2018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Stock Market Manipulation and Its Regulation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.70

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.89 × 0.4 = 0.36
M · momentum0.79 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.