arbiter
JournalsAccount

Marine protected areas and global marine sustainability: an empirical study using the Pressure–State–Response framework

Dae Eui Kim & Song Soo Lim

Environment and Development Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x2610045xarticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated to protect marine ecosystems and manage unsustainable fishing, but their outcomes vary by economic and governance contexts. Drawing on a panel dataset spanning 1995–2021 and employing the Pressure–State–Response framework, this study analyses how MPA coverage is associated with overexploited fish stocks and examines Official Development Assistance (ODA). Results show MPAs in high-income countries are associated with lower overexploited catch rates, reflecting robust governance. In low-income nations, however, limited capacity is often linked to ‘paper parks’ with negligible impact. Multi-purpose ODA – supporting sustainability goals – appears more effective than single-purpose ODA and is associated with better conservation outcomes. Integrating MPAs with fisheries management, supported by international assistance for enforcement, appears important for bridging disparities in effectiveness. By highlighting the interplay among economic conditions, governance and funding, this study offers higher-level insights into factors that shape MPA effectiveness, contributing to broader policy discussions on marine conservation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x2610045x

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dae2026,
  title        = {{Marine protected areas and global marine sustainability: an empirical study using the Pressure–State–Response framework}},
  author       = {Dae Eui Kim & Song Soo Lim},
  journal      = {Environment and Development Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x2610045x},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Marine protected areas and global marine sustainability: an empirical study using the Pressure–State–Response framework

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.