On the Hamilton-HP Filter Controversy: Evidence from German Business Cycles

Lars-H. R. Siemers

Journal of Business Cycle Research2024https://doi.org/10.1007/s41549-025-00107-0article
ABDC B
Weight
0.52

Abstract

James Hamilton put doubt on the quality of the HP filter estimates, and proposed an alternative regression approach to decompose trend and cycle of time series (H filter). We investigate the new H filter in detail and compare it to the HP filter. We apply both to German GDP time series. We find that in times of huge shocks the regular H filter produces unreliable trends. Its Quast-Wolters modification (QWH filter), in contrast, does not suffer from this issue. Checking expert benchmark congruency, we find that this modification outperforms all parameter constellations of the standard H filter. With a benchmark-specific adequate choice of the smoothing factor, in turn, the HP filter outperforms the H filter. The H filter, however, outperforms the HP filter with regard to correlation with expert benchmark recession dating. And the H filter uniquely outperforms the HP filter in capturing the gap-inflation link, an issue especially important for central banks. Overall, our results suggest using the QWH filter among the H filter options, and a smoothing factor of 38 for the HP filter.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41549-025-00107-0

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lars-h.2024,
  title        = {{On the Hamilton-HP Filter Controversy: Evidence from German Business Cycles}},
  author       = {Lars-H. R. Siemers},
  journal      = {Journal of Business Cycle Research},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41549-025-00107-0},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the Hamilton-HP Filter Controversy: Evidence from German Business Cycles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.52

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.52 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.