Pedestrian mobility and University campus accessibility: an analysis of student preferences

Michela Le Pira

European Transport / Trasporti Europei2024https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.10article
ABDC C
Weight
0.56

What the paper says

Prioritizing pedestrian mobility is crucial to foster urban liveability and sustainability, particularly on university campuses that are experienced by students. This paper examines the University of Catania (Italy) campus, a significant open space facing accessibility challenges. Two surveys were conducted within a Living Lab framework to assess student opinions on campus walking experiences and identify key criteria for promoting walking to and within the campus. The Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) algorithm and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were chosen for the analysis, deriving insights for policy-makers and mobility managers to enhance accessibility and encourage active mobility. The specific case study demonstrates the importance of creating pedestrian-friendly environments to foster sustainable lifestyles by addressing accessibility barriers in large open spaces. However, this research provides a wider framework which is applicable to urban planning in similar contexts, emphasizing the pivotal role of pedestrian-centric design in creating vibrant and sustainable university environments.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.10

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michela2024,
  title        = {{Pedestrian mobility and University campus accessibility: an analysis of student preferences}},
  author       = {Michela Le Pira},
  journal      = {European Transport / Trasporti Europei},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.10},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pedestrian mobility and University campus accessibility: an analysis of student preferences

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.56

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.61 × 0.4 = 0.25
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.