Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States

Joelle Abramowitz & Andrew Joung

ILR Review (Industrial and Labor Relations Review)2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251411263article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

A substantial share of workers are self-employed, but there is a dearth of data on heterogeneity in these work arrangements. To address this gap, the authors identify the variety of self-employment work arrangements in novel data produced using machine learning, leveraging 2003–2019 Panel Study of Income Dynamics respondents’ narrative descriptions of their industry, type of work, and employer names. The authors examine trends in the prevalence and nature of these forms of self-employment, transitions across them, and who works in them. Findings show disparate trends in the prevalence of different work arrangements and in transitions across work arrangements that would otherwise be masked. Further results suggest that the informally self-employed are less likely to have business assets, engage in more routine and less abstract skills on their jobs, are less educated, are less likely to be male and non-Hispanic White, have less labor income, and have worse well-being.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251411263

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joelle2026,
  title        = {{Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States}},
  author       = {Joelle Abramowitz & Andrew Joung},
  journal      = {ILR Review (Industrial and Labor Relations Review)},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251411263},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.