Temporal Attunements of Care: Scrutinising Counselling Practices in the Context of Prenatal Testing and Abortion

Veronika Siegl & Eva Sänger

Sociology of Health and Illness2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70179article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article focuses on decision-making in the context of counselling practices around prenatal testing and disability-selective abortion in Austria and Germany. Starting from the conceptualisation of prenatal care as part of a risk-oriented anticipatory regime of reproduction, we show that there is an eminently temporal dimension to prenatal care that has received little scholarly attention to date. We centre on this dimension of care, asking how prenatal decision-making processes are enacted, shaped, limited and ordered by medico-legal time frames. We are specifically interested in what kind of care emerges in relation to these time frames and whom or what is taken care of in these processes. Based on the analysis of three ethnographic vignettes, we argue that good care in the context of prenatal testing and abortion unfolds through multiple modes of what we call 'temporal attunements' to particular needs, patients and situations. As pregnancy proceeds, different medico-legal times are invoked strategically in favour of practicing good care, and different subjects, objects and entities are moved into and out of the centre of care.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70179

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{veronika2026,
  title        = {{Temporal Attunements of Care: Scrutinising Counselling Practices in the Context of Prenatal Testing and Abortion}},
  author       = {Veronika Siegl & Eva Sänger},
  journal      = {Sociology of Health and Illness},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70179},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Temporal Attunements of Care: Scrutinising Counselling Practices in the Context of Prenatal Testing and Abortion

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.