South African e-commerce logistics: Reproducing racialised capitalism through warehouse work

Bridget Kenny

Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation2025https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.2.0005article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Based on industry reports and interviews with warehouse workers and unions, this article examines how the global patterns of e-commerce logistics are integrated with and constituted through concrete relations of racialised labour processes in South Africa. It analyses the specificity of the growth of capital investment, the expansion of consumer markets, new state interests and the new use of digital technology in the labour process of e-commerce-based warehouse work in South Africa. Many new features of work organisation in warehouses are experienced by black workers through longer-term relations of surveillant racial despotism and limited employment futures. Scholarship on logistics globally, especially research purporting to explain the trajectory of workers’ politics at the local level, has tended to underestimate the articulation of logistics in time and space. In this article, we examine how histories of capital investment, a highly precarious racialised labour market, lack of skill recognition and union organising legacies reveal how continuities intertwine with new patterns of logistics.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.2.0005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bridget2025,
  title        = {{South African e-commerce logistics: Reproducing racialised capitalism through warehouse work}},
  author       = {Bridget Kenny},
  journal      = {Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.2.0005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

South African e-commerce logistics: Reproducing racialised capitalism through warehouse work

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.