arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Co-opted boards and bidder performance

Syed Shams et al.

China Accounting and Finance Review2025https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-02-2024-0013article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Purpose Defining co-opted directors as those who join a company’s board after an incumbent chief executive officer assumes office, this study aims to investigate the influence of co-opted boards on bidder performance. Design/methodology/approach This study applies ordinary least squares regression analyses to a sample of 8,939 acquisition observations announced by US firms spanning the 1999–2019 period. Event study methodology was employed to capture the market response to acquisition announcements. Propensity score matching technique, a two-stage least squares instrumental variable approach and model selection through the Lasso method were performed for robustness and endogeneity correction purposes. Findings The results depict a significant negative relationship between a co-opted board and return to acquirers, suggesting that managers under co-opted boards make value-destructing Mergers and Acquisitions deals. We also show that the relationship between board co-option and acquisition performance is positively moderated by institutional ownership while being negatively moderated by an entrenched board. Our additional tests reveal that board co-option reduces acquisition efficiency and leads to worse financial performance. Practical implications This study offers important implications for regulators and policymakers by highlighting how poor monitoring of the board of directors can influence announcement returns. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper appears to be the first investigation that makes a link between board co-option and various dimensions of acquisition decision.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-02-2024-0013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{syed2025,
  title        = {{Co-opted boards and bidder performance}},
  author       = {Syed Shams et al.},
  journal      = {China Accounting and Finance Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-02-2024-0013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Co-opted boards and bidder performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.