arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Technological Change Embodied in Southern NSW and British Wheat Varieties

David P. Godden et al.

Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics1994https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12488article
ABDC C
Weight
0.29

What the paper says

A comparison was made of increases in British and southern NSW wheat yields associated with genetic improvements. Estimates of these improvements were initially compared in each location using two different techniques. These techniques were a "variety improvement index" and a "vintage yield function". Yield increases "due to" genetic improvements were then compared between countries using both techniques. The variety improvement index technique suggested that there was little overall difference between genetic improvement in wheat in Britain and southern NSW. The vintage yield function technique suggested that the rate of yield increase for all varieties "due to" genetic improvement was markedly inferior in southern NSW. Estimated genetic improvement in southern NSW "food" wheats was similar to estimated genetic improvements in British bread wheats.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12488

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david1994,
  title        = {{Technological Change Embodied in Southern NSW and British Wheat Varieties}},
  author       = {David P. Godden et al.},
  journal      = {Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics},
  year         = {1994},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12488},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Technological Change Embodied in Southern NSW and British Wheat Varieties

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.29

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.09 × 0.4 = 0.03
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.