arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Identifying Factor Importance in Empirical Asset Pricing by Interpretable Machine Learning

Sampan Nettayanun & Siriyos Chuthanondha

The Journal of Financial Data Science2025https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.212article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We illustrate the use of interpretable machine learning to explain portfolio monthly returns. There are 188 financial anomalies from global-q.org in the analysis using artificial neural network models. We employ Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and Shapley additive global importance (SAGE) to identify the importance of factors. SHAP is constructed from local observations. We use SAGE as global interpretability. These methods can show how important these factors are to explaining portfolios’ returns. The importance of the factors in explaining portfolio returns differs from the overall period to the subperiods. The top contributors can also depend on how the variable is defined in each category of factors. We also extend the analysis from monthly to daily returns, containing 900,520 observations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.212

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sampan2025,
  title        = {{Identifying Factor Importance in Empirical Asset Pricing by Interpretable Machine Learning}},
  author       = {Sampan Nettayanun & Siriyos Chuthanondha},
  journal      = {The Journal of Financial Data Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.212},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Identifying Factor Importance in Empirical Asset Pricing by Interpretable Machine Learning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.