How trust and relationships impact on the giving decisions of philanthropists

Caroline Greenhalgh & Paul Montgomery

Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing2024https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1854article
AJG 1
Weight
0.63

What the paper says

Numerous studies have sought to understand why philanthropists are not giving more to charity. Two recently published studies identified a lack of faith in charities and an absence of trust as significant barriers to philanthropy. We report on the findings of a qualitative study which sought to examine the extent to which trust, and relationships influence the wealthy to give or withhold funding to charities. We employed in‐depth qualitative research methods and semi‐structured, conversational‐style, interviews as the major form of data collection. We utilised Braun and Clarke's ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ method of thematic analysis which gave rise to 4 key themes and 9 sub‐themes. Findings revealed that trust underpins the relationships that philanthropists have with charities and is an important conduit to forging an ongoing relationship. Trust is frequently relied upon as a proxy for evidence and an absence of trust will usually lead a philanthropist to withhold funding.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1854

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{caroline2024,
  title        = {{How trust and relationships impact on the giving decisions of philanthropists}},
  author       = {Caroline Greenhalgh & Paul Montgomery},
  journal      = {Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1854},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How trust and relationships impact on the giving decisions of philanthropists

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.63

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.79 × 0.4 = 0.32
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.