Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service

Nevbahar Ertas

Public Personnel Management2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260251409828article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines perceptions of prohibited personnel practices (PPPs) involving partisan politics in the federal workforce. Among the 18 prohibited practices tracked by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, two—political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion—doubled in a decade from 2010 to 2021. First, the perceived prevalence of PPPs involving partisan politics is examined by agency and organizational ethical climate. Then, multivariate models are used to investigate whether perceptions of political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion influence federal employees’ turnover intentions and attitudes toward their agencies as workplaces. The analysis showed that such perceptions negatively affected public servants, making them less likely to recommend their agency as a workplace and more likely to consider leaving their agency. The discussion articulates why partisan politics in civil service is a critical topic for democratic governance and organizational theory in general, and human resource management in particular.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260251409828

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nevbahar2026,
  title        = {{Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service}},
  author       = {Nevbahar Ertas},
  journal      = {Public Personnel Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260251409828},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.