arbiter
JournalsAccount

Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement

Rodrigo Furst et al.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104922article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Political participation is a key mechanism through which individuals express their preferences in democratic systems. Thus, unequal participation may allow some groups to exert disproportionate influence on political outcomes. This research examines the existence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in political engagement and sheds light on the psychological mechanisms driving these disparities across seven studies. Using nationwide surveys from 47 countries ( N = 70,417), Study 1 reveals an SES gap in political engagement across various domains (e.g., voting, boycotting) and shows that this gap is partly due to lower political efficacy—one's perceived ability to influence political affairs—among low-SES individuals. Study 2 ( N = 545) replicates these findings in a representative sample of the Brazilian population, using a behavioral proxy for political participation. Studies 3a-c ( N 3a = 301; N 3b = 302; N 3c = 301) experimentally manipulate SES among U.S. participants and show that effectively inducing lower-SES perceptions reduces political engagement. Studies 4a-b ( N 4a = 301; N 4b = 328) test an intervention in a lab-in-the-field experiment with extremely deprived residents of Rio de Janeiro's slums, showing that enhancing political efficacy increases participation among low-SES individuals both in the run-up to and in the aftermath of a national election. Together, these studies demonstrate that while SES is consistently linked to political participation, addressing psychological barriers and fostering political efficacy can help close the participation gap. In addition, this work contributes to broader methodological debates surrounding the measurement and experimental manipulation of socioeconomic conditions in psychological research. • Low-SES individuals are less politically engaged than high-SES individuals. • Political efficacy explains the association between SES and political engagement. • Promoting political efficacy can boost participation among low-SES individuals.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104922

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rodrigo2026,
  title        = {{Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement}},
  author       = {Rodrigo Furst et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104922},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.