Race Consciousness & Indigeneity in Human Resource Development: A Systematic Review of Racialization in Our Organizations & Communities

Stephanie Sisco et al.

Human Resource Development Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251331660review
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study used race consciousness and Indigeneity as a conceptual lens to examine the current state of research in the field of human resource development (HRD) pertaining to the racialization of Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC). The findings revealed significant disparities across HRD journals that publish this content. An analysis of 53 peer-reviewed articles also uncovered recurring themes, with leadership emerging as the most prevalent, and issues related to higher education on the rise. Numerous studies discussed HRD’s (potential) role and contribution to racial reform as well. Consequently, we suggest the problem is not the absence of research on how racialization operates within our communities and organizations, but perhaps the nominal dissemination and visibility of such scholarship within HRD graduate education. Other implications of this study exposed gaps in theory-building research and raised concerns surrounding the criticality needed to support Indigenous-informed studies within HRD.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251331660

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stephanie2025,
  title        = {{Race Consciousness & Indigeneity in Human Resource Development: A Systematic Review of Racialization in Our Organizations & Communities}},
  author       = {Stephanie Sisco et al.},
  journal      = {Human Resource Development Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251331660},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Race Consciousness & Indigeneity in Human Resource Development: A Systematic Review of Racialization in Our Organizations & Communities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.