arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Framing Motives and Objectives: Which Frames Increase US Public Support for Defending Taiwan?

Chung‐Li Wu & Alex Min‐Wei Lin

Social Science Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70126article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Objective Recent opinion surveys show that a majority of Americans support providing military aid—but not US troops—to Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. However, what motivates American public support for committing US forces to the island's defense? Methods Through a randomized online survey experiment with 3054 US adults, this study investigates the basic motivations driving this support—that is, (a) the extent to which the US incentives for assisting Taiwan are driven by self‐interest or altruism and (b) the degree to which US foreign policy objectives for defending Taiwan are abstract or concrete. Results The results indicate a modest but significant increase in support for intervention when respondents were presented with frames that emphasized self‐interest and concrete objectives (e.g., tangible economic and technological benefits), whereas appeals to altruism produced weaker effects. Conclusion These findings show the detectable and robust effects of self‐interest frames, particularly given rising public war‐weariness and shifting US foreign policy priorities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70126

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chung‐li2026,
  title        = {{Framing Motives and Objectives: Which Frames Increase US Public Support for Defending Taiwan?}},
  author       = {Chung‐Li Wu & Alex Min‐Wei Lin},
  journal      = {Social Science Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70126},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Framing Motives and Objectives: Which Frames Increase US Public Support for Defending Taiwan?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.