Democracy, governance, and environmental policy effectiveness: a cross-country analysis with Sustainable Governance Indicators

Sevi Dokuzoğlu & Arif Eser Güzel

European Journal of Government and Economics2024https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9902article
ABDC C
Weight
0.49

What the paper says

The effectiveness of environmental policies has been extensively studied, often focusing solely on environmental degradation indicators. However, successful environmental policies have broader societal impacts. This study addresses this limitation by utilizing the Sustainable Governance Indicators (SGIs) for a more comprehensive measurement of environmental policy effectiveness. Analyzing 41 countries with data from 2014-2021, a fixed-effects model was employed to assess the impact of democratic and good governance practices on environmental policy success. The findings reveal that democracy and government quality are crucial determinants of effective environmental policies, highlighting the need for improved institutional structures. The robustness of these results is confirmed using alternative democracy and governance indicators. Additionally, the study identifies education, urbanization, and population density as significant factors influencing environmental policy performance.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9902

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sevi2024,
  title        = {{Democracy, governance, and environmental policy effectiveness: a cross-country analysis with Sustainable Governance Indicators}},
  author       = {Sevi Dokuzoğlu & Arif Eser Güzel},
  journal      = {European Journal of Government and Economics},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9902},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Democracy, governance, and environmental policy effectiveness: a cross-country analysis with Sustainable Governance Indicators

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.49

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.47 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.