Options for accommodating place management within devolved, place-based governance and delivery

Christopher Wade & Graham Galpin

Journal of Place Management and Development2025https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-10-2025-0144article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to undertake a review of options available post-devolution, for place-based governance and delivery in England, that accommodate place management. Design/methodology/approach This is a viewpoint article drawing on the knowledge and experiences of two experienced practitioners supported by appropriate referencing. Findings The paper supports the idea that devolved local governance should adopt a pluralist approach, with options including area committees; existing town and parish councils; place-based, systems approaches; place partnerships; and community anchors and covenants. There is scope for different delivery options to co-exist and complement each other in the same area. Originality/value This paper provides a framework to discuss a pluralist approach to devolved local governance, including consultation with government.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-10-2025-0144

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2025,
  title        = {{Options for accommodating place management within devolved, place-based governance and delivery}},
  author       = {Christopher Wade & Graham Galpin},
  journal      = {Journal of Place Management and Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-10-2025-0144},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Options for accommodating place management within devolved, place-based governance and delivery

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.