arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Seeing the value

Unknown author

Development and Learning in Organizations2026https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-01-2026-0057article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/methodology/approach This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings This paper identified that perceptions around intelligence and humanness can impact the knowledge sharing with generative artificial intelligence. Research limitations/implications This paper looked at some of the complexities and nuances involved when it comes to generative artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing. Practical implications This paper identified how organizations can improve knowledge sharing by working on perceived intelligence and perceived humanness of generative artificial intelligence. Originality/value The briefing saves busy executives, strategists and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-01-2026-0057

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Seeing the value}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Development and Learning in Organizations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-01-2026-0057},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Seeing the value

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.