How cognitive elaboration fosters knowledge acquisition on social media—a field experiment

Luna T. Frauhammer & Jana H. Dreston

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf014article
AJG 3
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Social media technologies have been criticized as ineffective sources of information because users seem to increase their subjective but not their objective knowledge. While different factors such as multitasking have been brought up as explanations, direct and fair comparisons of learning outcomes between social and traditional news media are missing. This two-wave field experiment (N1 = 902, N2 = 663) shows that whereas participants receiving information on social media did learn less than participants receiving the same information through an email newsletter, this difference disappeared when cognitive elaboration on social media was triggered through elaboration questions. Correlational analyses further suggest that multitasking is one factor which hinders successful knowledge acquisition on social media. Our findings suggest that learning through social media is possible if social media contents invite cognitively elaborate processing.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf014

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luna2025,
  title        = {{How cognitive elaboration fosters knowledge acquisition on social media—a field experiment}},
  author       = {Luna T. Frauhammer & Jana H. Dreston},
  journal      = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf014},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How cognitive elaboration fosters knowledge acquisition on social media—a field experiment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.