Ways of Understanding Chinese Expansion: Chineseness and Two Chinas

Abdürreşit Celil Karluk

China Report2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241305223article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

It is well documented that the distinct social, cultural and physical boundaries separating non-Chinese minorities from the Chinese, who inhabit about 65% of China’s territory, have been eroded by the persistent and pervasive multidimensional influence and direct intervention of the Chinese state. Consequently, these regions are undergoing a transformation that can be defined as ‘Cultural China’. This process is being facilitated by state-sponsored settler colonial policies and consistent Sinicisation practices. This article aims to make a modest contribution to the existing literature on Chinese expansionism and colonialism by analysing Chinese–non-Chinese relations through the lens of the phenomenon of Chineseness. By focusing on the Chineseness and the existence of two Chinas within China’s political borders—cultural China and political China—the article seeks to answer following key questions: In what ways and through what processes are non-Chinese nations and regions Sinicised? What role does Chineseness play in shaping the dynamics of relations between Chinese and non-Chinese groups? How can China establish and sustain a long-term, and potentially permanent, presence in these regions? Furthermore, the article puts forward the argument that China may be perceived as an expansionist and colonialist state, thereby challenging the official Chinese narrative.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241305223

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{abdürreşit2025,
  title        = {{Ways of Understanding Chinese Expansion: Chineseness and Two Chinas}},
  author       = {Abdürreşit Celil Karluk},
  journal      = {China Report},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241305223},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ways of Understanding Chinese Expansion: Chineseness and Two Chinas

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.