Sentiment Analysis in Political Education Reviews Using Aspect-Level Coupled Reflective Network

Jiale Kang & Jiayuan Kang

International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining2026https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.402700article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

As ideological and political education strengthens in institutions of higher education, there is a growing need for automated methods that identify emotions and ideological stances in student comments. Existing approaches have focused on sentiment polarity and have struggled with multidimensional emotions, sentiment–ideology interactions, and indirect or metaphorical expressions, resulting in limited granularity and interpretability. To address these challenges, this study proposes an Aspect-level Coupled Reflective Network (ACR-Net) for the joint modeling of sentiment and ideology. ACR-Net extracts aspect semantics using large language models, builds fused representations through a module coupling ideology with emotion, and incorporates a sentiment weighted network and reflective calibration mechanism to capture local cues and handle implicit expressions. Experiments on real ideological and political student comments demonstrated that ACR-Net surpasses existing methods in accuracy, interpretability, and generalization. Our code is available at https://github.com/jialekang/Aspect-level-Coupled-Reflective-Network.git.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.402700

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jiale2026,
  title        = {{Sentiment Analysis in Political Education Reviews Using Aspect-Level Coupled Reflective Network}},
  author       = {Jiale Kang & Jiayuan Kang},
  journal      = {International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.402700},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sentiment Analysis in Political Education Reviews Using Aspect-Level Coupled Reflective Network

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.